[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: test modules and license
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: test modules and license |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jan 2007 17:56:34 -0600 |
Meanwhile, I'd like to ask about this unchanged sentence:
The source files always say "GPL", but the real license
specification is in the module description file.
I don't understand. Legally, what counts is the license in the actual
source file. You can't point to some other file and say "but it says
LGPL there so it's really LGPL".
I remember previous discussions about this, and that we were taking
advantage of the LGPL->GPL upgrade in places, I think. But I don't
remember anything like the above.
Can someone tell me an example, so I can understand better?
Thanks,
k
- test modules and license, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/14
- Re: test modules and license,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: test modules and license, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/15
- Re: test modules and license, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/16
- Re: test modules and license, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/18
- Re: test modules and license, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/20
- Re: test modules and license, Karl Berry, 2007/01/16
- Re: test modules and license, Simon Josefsson, 2007/01/17
- Re: test modules and license, Paul Eggert, 2007/01/17
- Re: test modules and license, Simon Josefsson, 2007/01/16
- Re: test modules and license, Bruno Haible, 2007/01/17