[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:48:24 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> Paul, what's your opinion on this? Should gnulib includes overrides under
> the same function name, even if they contradict the respective platform's
> documentation?
I think gnulib is for porting GNU applications, and if GNU
applications assume glibc behavior for a function then it's OK to
replace a vendor's function that behaves differrently.
- fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/15
- Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/15
- Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile, Bruno Haible, 2007/02/15
- Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/15
- Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile, Bruno Haible, 2007/02/15
- Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile, Bruno Haible, 2007/02/15
- Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile, Bruno Haible, 2007/02/17
- Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/17
- Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile, Bruno Haible, 2007/02/20
- Re: fix inadequate Windows implementation of tmpfile, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/20