Re: Reconciliation of libsnprintfv vs. autogen

[Daniel Jacobowitz]

On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 08:21:15AM -0800, Bruce Korb wrote:
> > #define PRINTF_ERROR(pi, str) \
> >-        printf_error(pi, __FILE__, __LINE__, SNV_ASSERT_FMT, str);
> >+        printf_error(pi, __FILE__, __LINE__, SNV_ASSERT_FCN, str);
> >
> >That's not defined anywhere.
> 
> It is a function name.  It is supposed to get defined to
> __FUNCTION__ for GCC and empty for anything else.
> It is a configurable.  (Shouldn't it be __FILE__ for anything else?)
> 
> >../../libsnprintfv/snprintfv/printf.c: In function
> >'parse_printf_format':
> >../../libsnprintfv/snprintfv/printf.c:386: error: 'SNV_ASSERT_FCN'
> >undeclared (first use in this function)
> 
> Something is broken in the configury.

In the autogen sources it appears to be named SNV_ASSERT_FCN.  In the
libsnprintfv repository, it's named SNV_ASSERT_FMT - just grep for it.
Which one should it be?  Can't have half and half.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery