Re: group modules into subdirectories

[James Youngman]

On 3/29/07, Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:
> That's true.  I guess it depends on the refactor discriminator.
> Either based or content (crypto, unicode, string-functions,
> math-functions, etc), or type (header, file, etc).  To me, all the
> crypto stuff seems self-contained and uninteresting for anyone who
> doesn't want to see them, and thus it makes sense to have them in a
> separate directory.  I guess I could make a similar case for unicode
> functions or math functions.


Hmm, you've made me wonder if it's useful just to follow whatever
directory organisation glibc uses...

James.