Re: group modules into subdirectories

[Simon Josefsson]

address@hidden (Karl Berry) writes:

> Not to be low-tech, but how about 26 subdirectories a..z?
> That way, if I know the name, I know the subdirectory.

That's a good solution to improve performance for computers (which
tend to dislike large directories) but IMHO I don't think it is a good
separation from a human point of view.

I don't know what a good solution here is, though... However, is there
anyone who thinks that any solution in this problem-space would be
incompatible with moving all the crypto modules to modules/crypto and
lib/crypto/?  I think that will slightly lessen this problem.  Unless
someone objects, I'll do that next week.

/Simon