[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFT: *printf-posix modules
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: RFT: *printf-posix modules |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2007 14:36:36 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org> writes:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This is a request for testing. The *printf-posix modules should not work
> fine and pass all tests on
> IRIX 6.5
I noticed you added a patch that allows "nan0x7fffffff" instead of "nan". My
reading of POSIX says this is illegal and that IRIX has a bug; if the n-char-
sequence form of NaN is used, it must be in the style "nan(0x7fffffff)", with
the ( and ) as literal characters. Compare the wording in C99 and POSIX for
strtod() and nan().
--
Eric Blake
Re: RFT: *printf-posix modules, Eric Blake, 2007/05/20
Re: RFT: *printf-posix modules,
Eric Blake <=