bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Test results for m4-1.4.9b on HP-UX 10


From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: Test results for m4-1.4.9b on HP-UX 10
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2007 03:15:07 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> hppa2.0-hp-hpux10.20: Unable to compile 1 gnulib test;
> 2 gnulib test failures and 1 failed m4 check
>
>  cc  -I. -I../lib  -I. -I. -I.. -I./.. -I../lib -I./../lib   +O2 -Ae -z 
> +Onofltacc +ESlit +DAportable +Oentrysched +Odataprefetch +Onolimit -c 
> test-stdint.c
>  cpp: "stdint.h", line 48: warning 2013: Unknown preprocessing directive.
>  cpp: "stdio.h", line 24: warning 2013: Unknown preprocessing directive.
>  cpp: "stdio.h", line 36: warning 2013: Unknown preprocessing directive.
>  cpp: "stdlib.h", line 24: warning 2013: Unknown preprocessing directive.
>  cpp: "stdlib.h", line 36: warning 2013: Unknown preprocessing directive.
>  cpp: "test-stdint.c", line 250: warning 2012: Unrepresentable preprocessor 
> number 1LL.
>  cpp: "test-stdint.c", line 250: error 4038: Bad syntax for #if condition.
>  cpp: "signal.h", line 24: warning 2013: Unknown preprocessing directive.
>  cpp: "signal.h", line 36: warning 2013: Unknown preprocessing directive.
>  gmake[4]: *** [test-stdint.o] Error 1
>
>  test-frexpl.c:111: assertion failed
>  /opt/fsw/bash30/bin/bash: line 1: 17730 ABORT instruction       (core 
> dumped) EXEEXT='' EXEEXT='' EXEEXT='' srcdir='.' EXEEXT='' srcdir='.' 
> EXEEXT='' srcdir='.' ${dir}$tst
>  FAIL: test-frexpl
>  test-vasprintf-posix.c:514: assertion failed
>  /opt/fsw/bash30/bin/bash: line 1: 17804 ABORT instruction       (core 
> dumped) EXEEXT='' EXEEXT='' EXEEXT='' srcdir='.' EXEEXT='' srcdir='.' 
> EXEEXT='' srcdir='.' ${dir}$tst
>  FAIL: test-vasprintf-posix

If you can reproduce these also with plain "cc -Ae", it would be good if
you could investigate details, such as:
  - what can be done to use 64-bit constants in preprocessor directives with
    this compiler?
  - where does the sign bit of the negative zero get lost?
  - does have_minus_zero () actually evaluate to true?

Bruno





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]