[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:09:48 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Jan-Benedict Glaw <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 13:27:49 -0400, Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> wrote:
>> read what i said again ... the clients are doing write()/read() on the
>> double
>> directly, but one side has debugging enabled so it additionally does
>> printf()
>> on the values coming across -> bam, server crashes
>
> So it didn't check its input prior using it.
Which function do I call to check a "long double" for validity
before using it? fpclassify doesn't have an appropriate return
value, and I don't know of another choice. I think I'm stuck
writing CPU- and floating point representation-specific code to
do this. Not fun.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, (continued)
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, James Youngman, 2007/06/06
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jakub Jelinek, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Mike Frysinger, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Mike Frysinger, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Mike Frysinger, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Tor Myklebust, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Nix, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/07
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Nix, 2007/06/08
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, James Youngman, 2007/06/08
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/08
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, James Youngman, 2007/06/08
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 2007/06/08
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, James Youngman, 2007/06/08