[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?
|
From: |
Petr Baudis |
|
Subject: |
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2007 19:36:12 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 05:02:53PM CEST, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> From monitoring this mailing list for a while it appears apparent
> that certain people pride themselves in rejecting any patch which improves
> the robustness of glibc.
I would describe it rather as not trading performance for hiding
application bugs.
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, (continued)
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Andreas Schwab, 2007/06/06
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Ulrich Drepper, 2007/06/06
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Bruno Haible, 2007/06/06
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Ulrich Drepper, 2007/06/06
- Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, James Youngman, 2007/06/07
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Bruno Haible, 2007/06/06
[PATCH] Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jakub Jelinek, 2007/06/06
Re: glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?, Jeremy Linton, 2007/06/07
arch-independent glibc printf segfault for "special" long double values, Jim Meyering, 2007/06/08