[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gplv3 files and updates
From: |
James Youngman |
Subject: |
Re: gplv3 files and updates |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:01:25 +0100 |
On 6/29/07, Karl Berry <address@hidden> wrote:
I am not sure how best to put GPLv3 and LGPLv3 into gnulib.
I think that when projects update to GPLv3, the "COPYING" file should be
GPLv3. But of course until the update, COPYING remains GPLv2.
Yes. gnulib will also need to update doc/gpl.texi and doc/gpl.txt.
Similarly for doc/lgpl.texi and doc/lgpl.txt.
Maybe we should have doc/COPYINGv2 and doc/COPYINGv3 (ditto
COPYING.LESSER) in gnulib, with no doc/COPYING at all, so the choice is
explicit? Other ideas?
That seems reasonable to me at first. Projects which include gnulib
code will need to slect one or the other because mixing the two is not
possible, AIUI.
James.
- gplv3 files and updates, Karl Berry, 2007/06/29
- Re: gplv3 files and updates,
James Youngman <=
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Simon Josefsson, 2007/06/29
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Bruce Korb, 2007/06/29
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Karl Berry, 2007/06/29
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Bruno Haible, 2007/06/29
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Karl Berry, 2007/06/29
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Bruno Haible, 2007/06/30
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Karl Berry, 2007/06/30
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, James Youngman, 2007/06/30
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, James Youngman, 2007/06/30
- Re: gplv3 files and updates, Bruno Haible, 2007/06/30