bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: canonicalize-lgpl-tests on cygwin


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: canonicalize-lgpl-tests on cygwin
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 20:16:10 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.12) Gecko/20070509 Thunderbird/1.5.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Bruno Haible on 7/3/2007 5:43 PM:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> You wrote on 2007-06-19:
>> I'm applying this as obvious.  Findutils 4.3.8 fails to compile out of the
>> box on cygwin without this, since the canonicalize-lgpl test is not linked
>> against libintl.
>>
>> 2007-06-19  Eric Blake  <address@hidden>
>>
>>      * modules/canonicalize-lgpl-tests (test_canonicalize_lgpl_LDADD):
>>      Allow compilation on cygwin.
> 
> I don't understand it: If test-canonicalize-lgpl depends - directly or
> indirectly on the module 'gettext-h', then @LIBINTL@ will expand to something
> (possibly empty) in the Makefile, then how can the error in Simon's logs
> occur? And if it doesn't, then where did the error that you saw in findutils
> on cygwin come from? ???

Hmm, I'm trying to get to the bottom of this.  Thanks for the heads up.  I
remember seeing the error only when compiling findutils, which uses the
canonicalize; maybe the error stemmed from a combination of modules in use
at the same time, in which it is not canonicalize that directly depends on
LIBINTL, but one of the other modules which it was interacting with.  I'll
see if I can reproduce the actual failure, by temporarily reverting that
patch.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGjFRq84KuGfSFAYARAsDNAJ4l2WTPEM8nIPQ/tohHbYFcGvSzYgCgvS1K
psnKsbmJaU7vFByCt7yvHJI=
=TDrt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]