Re: second call: please nail down the license terms of some more modules

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hello,

* Bruno Haible wrote on Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 04:59:02PM CEST:
> 
> There was no objection when I said that: the majority of gnulib modules will
> migrate from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ and from LGPLv2+ to LGPLv3+. So I assume we can
> go for it in a few days?
> 
> Before that, please mark the modules that you want to stay at the current
> license. We can also revert a license change for a module afterwards, if all
> contributors agree, but it's easier if it can be done upfront, because then
> it's legally a no-op.

Libtool/libltdl stays at its current state of licensing until all
the exception issues have been sorted out.  libltdl uses the argz
module.  I assume this is what I should apply then?

Thanks,
Ralf

2007-07-15  Ralf Wildenhues  <address@hidden>

        * modules/argz (License): LGPLv2+.

Index: modules/argz
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gnulib/gnulib/modules/argz,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.10 argz
--- modules/argz        13 Oct 2006 12:40:23 -0000      1.10
+++ modules/argz        15 Jul 2007 20:26:37 -0000
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 <argz.h>
 
 License:
-LGPL
+LGPLv2+
 
 Maintainer:
 address@hidden