Re: GPLv3 re-licensing

[Jim Meyering]

Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:

> How about this?
>
> I haven't been following the re-licensing discussions closely (still
> catching up), but these files seems to be used during the build phase,
> and using the GPLv3 for that seems non-controversial, or?
>
> Btw, libidn 1.0 (recently released) uses latest gnulib, and there were
> no license problems.  I'm doing the same exercise now with gsasl, but it
> seems there are no conflicts there either.
>
> /Simon
>
> Index: ChangeLog
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /sources/gnulib/gnulib/ChangeLog,v
> retrieving revision 1.1872
> diff -u -p -r1.1872 ChangeLog
> --- ChangeLog 31 Jul 2007 22:34:58 -0000      1.1872
> +++ ChangeLog 6 Aug 2007 13:55:04 -0000
> @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
> +2007-08-06  Simon Josefsson  <address@hidden>
> +
> +     * build-aux/maint.mk, build-aux/GNUmakefile: Relicense to GPLv3+.

Thanks.  Please commit.
I've already converted to GPLv3+ the files in coreutils
from which those are derived.