[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Traces of CVS in the documentation
|
From: |
Jim Meyering |
|
Subject: |
Re: Traces of CVS in the documentation |
|
Date: |
Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:31:16 +0200 |
Benoit SIGOURE <address@hidden> wrote:
> Wandering through http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/
> gnulib.txt.gz in order to find how to get a replacement for non-
> portable `trunc', I found:
> "We [...] recommend to use the newest version of Gnulib from the CVS"
> Although there is a RO git-cvsserver, shouldn't this be changed to
> advertise that the preferred way is to get it from Git? There are
> other traces of `CVS' in the documentation but maybe you people
> aren't willing to change them for now?
I'm certainly willing.
Patches more than welcome :)
- Traces of CVS in the documentation, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/10/03
- Re: Traces of CVS in the documentation,
Jim Meyering <=
- [PATCH] Advertise for the Git server instead of the CVS server., Benoit Sigoure, 2007/10/03
- Re: [PATCH] Advertise for the Git server instead of the CVS server., Bruno Haible, 2007/10/03
- Re: [PATCH] Advertise for the Git server instead of the CVS server., Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/10/04
- [PATCH] Advertise for the Git server instead of the CVS server., Benoit Sigoure, 2007/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] Advertise for the Git server instead of the CVS server., Karl Berry, 2007/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] Advertise for the Git server instead of the CVS server., Bruno Haible, 2007/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] Advertise for the Git server instead of the CVS server., Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/10/05
- Re: [PATCH] Advertise for the Git server instead of the CVS server., Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/10/04