Re: switch to (L)GPLv3

[Simon Josefsson]

Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:

> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> I needed the following modules under LGPLv2.1+:
>> 
>> dummy
>> float
>> realloc
>> stdlib
>> 
>> Any objections to this patch?
>
> No objection. We promised you the ability to do such changes, see
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-07/msg00155.html

Installed, thanks for quick response.

>> Btw, why is the mnemonic 'LGPLv2+' rather than 'LGPLv2.1+'?
>
> Because it's just a shorthand. It's not worth making the distinction
> between LGPL 2.0 and 2.1 in this context, IMO.

Right.

/Simon