[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:24:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> I guess that the bug lies in the printing of a long double value that
> is not exactly representable as a double.
This hardly explains it. Jim observes a call
scale10_round_decimal_long_double (x, n=1)
where x is some valid value. The code of scale10_round_decimal_long_double
does not use the 'double' type; all it uses are 'long double', 'int', and
'unsigned int'.
Bruno
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Jim Meyering, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/20
- Message not available
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Jim Meyering, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Jim Meyering, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/11/21