[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1 |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:27:15 -0800 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> OK, so let's try a runtime test instead of a compile-time test.
OK, but for cross-compilation we need to assume that the bug is absent
(contrary to our usual practice for run-time tests), because otherwise
cross-compilation will generate the wrong code for the hosts that do
'long double' correctly. The idea will be that we don't support
cross-compilation to "buggy" hosts like FreeBSD 6.1.
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, (continued)
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/20
- Message not available
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/20
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Jim Meyering, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Jim Meyering, 2007/11/21
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Paul Eggert, 2007/11/21
Re: "seq .1 .1" would mistakenly generate no output on FreeBSD 6.1, Bruno Haible, 2007/11/26