[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: memmem issues
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Re: memmem issues |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Jan 2008 00:20:59 +0100 (MET) |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> section 6.2.6.1:
> ...
> Here again, the intent is that memcmp(&x, &y, sizeof (T)) compares all
> the bits in the underlying representation. The only way to do that
> portably is via "unsigned char *".
OK. Here's a proposed patch for the memmem function.
Bruno
- Re: Re: memmem issues,
Bruno Haible <=