[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'make' modification time warning
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: 'make' modification time warning |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jan 2008 22:49:05 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:
> This warning occurs, for example, when I create a tarball on
> one computer and then transfer it to another computer and build it there.
> If the time difference is "12 seconds" I know I can retry in 15 seconds.
You like to live dangerously. :-)
Personally I just use NTP and configure proper time zones. It's been
many years since I encountered either of the situations that you
mentioned. Perhaps I lead a sheltered life.
Come to think of it, I do recall running into clock skew issues with
"make" with NFS and parallel builds in a cluster, where the time
stamps were only small fractions of a second off. For this sort of
application I suppose a "human_time" module should report something
like "35 microseconds", which I suppose is mildly more useful than
"3.5e-05 seconds".
- Proposed module, releasedate, James Youngman, 2008/01/09
- Re: Proposed module, releasedate, Bruno Haible, 2008/01/09
- Re: Proposed module, releasedate, James Youngman, 2008/01/10
- human-time? (was: Re: Proposed module, releasedate), Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: human-time?, Bruno Haible, 2008/01/10
- Re: human-time?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: human-time?, Simon Josefsson, 2008/01/10
- Re: human-time?, Bruno Haible, 2008/01/10
- Re: human-time?, Paul Eggert, 2008/01/10
- Re: 'make' modification time warning (was: Re: human-time?), Bruno Haible, 2008/01/10
- Re: 'make' modification time warning,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: 'make' modification time warning, Matthew Woehlke, 2008/01/22
- Re: Proposed module, releasedate, Bruno Haible, 2008/01/10