Re: Alignment issue with sha1 code from gnulib

[Jim Meyering]

Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:

> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Thanks for the suggestion.  It looks like a good one.
>
> The suggestion also applies to the 'md5' module, after which the 'sha1' module
> is modeled.

Yep.  md2 and md4 too.
For now, I've pushed the sha1 changes.

> But if you apply the suggestion to both the sha1 and md5 modules, we get
> an additional difference to glibc code.

That's unfortunate, but I agree it's not a big problem.
If upstream glibc is no longer able to evolve, I don't want
to let that impede progress here.