[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
extensions module and Solaris
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
extensions module and Solaris |
Date: |
Tue, 27 May 2008 17:35:09 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
I just debugged a failure of the m4 master branch testsuite on Solaris 8, and
tracked it to the fact that system(2) was using /bin/sh as its shell. The
Solaris documentation claims that defining _POSIX_SOURCE prior to including any
system headers will make system(2) use /bin/ksh instead, which should resolve
the situation. But in my (limited) testing, I wasn't able to get that to
happen with either gcc 3.3 or /usr/ucb/cc as the compiler and -D_POSIX_SOURCE=1
on the command line. Any ideas on how to select the standards-compliant system
(2) implementation on Solaris? And should m4/extensions.m4 blindly define
_POSIX_SOURCE for Solaris, like it already does for Minix, so as to favor the
standard-compliant implementation of functions like system(2) that are
documented to behave differently depending on compilation environment?
--
Eric Blake
- extensions module and Solaris,
Eric Blake <=