Re: sigaction, SA_SIGINFO, and SIG_IGN

[Bruno Haible]

Jason Zions wrote about Interix 3.5:
> Interix and the Vista/WS08 Subsystem for UNIX Applications do not include an
> sa_sigaction member, as you point out, but they don't claim to conform to
> the C Extensions or to IEEE Std 1003.1-2001.

Then, if the system does not claim to conform to POSIX, you don't need to
CC the Austin Group. Interix 3.5 does not even conform to ISO C 99: it lacks
elementary header files such as <stdint.h>, <inttypes.h>, <complex.h>, etc.

Bruno