[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FD_ISSET replacement
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: FD_ISSET replacement |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:09:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> The sys_socket module generates this warning:
>
> ../lgl/sys/socket.h: In function 'rpl_fd_isset':
> ../lgl/sys/socket.h:158: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
> ../lgl/sys/socket.h:159: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
>
> I pushed the patch below.
>
> However, is the code really appropriate? I'm thinking of this comment:
>
> /* Re-define FD_ISSET to avoid a WSA call while we are not using
> network sockets. */
This comments means IMO that when someone is using select() on pipes and
console handles, he should not make ws2_32 calls.
> static inline int
> -rpl_fd_isset (int fd, fd_set * set)
> +rpl_fd_isset (SOCKET fd, fd_set * set)
> {
> - int i;
> + u_int i;
> if (set == NULL)
> return 0;
I agree with the signature change, because this FD_ISSET replacement is
called by winsock-select.c. For the type of 'i', better use a portable type,
such as 'unsigned int'. 'u_int' is not a portable type - it may be present in
mingw and absent in MSVC's headers, who knows. Proposed patch below.
Bruno
--- lib/sys_socket.in.h.orig 2008-10-23 03:08:52.000000000 +0200
+++ lib/sys_socket.in.h 2008-10-23 03:08:42.000000000 +0200
@@ -122,7 +122,8 @@
static inline int
rpl_fd_isset (SOCKET fd, fd_set * set)
{
- u_int i;
+ unsigned int i;
+
if (set == NULL)
return 0;