[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnulib.texi license
|
From: |
Karl Berry |
|
Subject: |
Re: gnulib.texi license |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Oct 2008 18:35:29 -0500 |
The manual contains a copy of GFDLv1.2 but claims to use v1.1, which
seems inconsistent. Is there a reason not to use v1.2?
I don't know of any reason for any package to use FDL 1.1. I am
surprised to see it. But as I recall, Bruno did this part, so we
should wait to hear from him.
BTW, I believe this copyright line is legally dubious since it has no
valid years:
Copyright @copyright{} 200X-200Y Free Software Foundation, address@hidden
karl