[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fdl-1.3
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: fdl-1.3 |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:01:26 -0600 |
address@hidden fdl.texi
address@hidden fdl-1.3.texi
I think standards.texi and maintain.texi should include the generic
fdl.texi. I updated fdl.texi in the gnustandards repo to be 1.3.
As for gnulib, I see that we have only specifically-numbered versions of
the {a,l,}gpl-*.texi and COPYINGv* in gnulib/doc. So why don't we do
the same for fdl (ie, rename fdl.texi to fdl-1.2.texi), as Simon
suggested? Sure, standards.texi and maintain.texi won't be processable
in gnulib, but so what, those are just slave copies for convenience.
Thanks,
karl
- Re: fdl-1.3, (continued)
- Re: fdl-1.3, Eric Blake, 2008/11/10
- Re: fdl-1.3,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: fdl-1.3, Eric Blake, 2008/11/10
- Re: fdl-1.3, Bruno Haible, 2008/11/10
- Re: fdl-1.3, Eric Blake, 2008/11/10
- Re: fdl-1.3, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2008/11/11
- Re: fdl-1.3, Bruno Haible, 2008/11/11
- Re: fdl-1.3, Eric Blake, 2008/11/11
- Re: fdl-1.3, Karl Berry, 2008/11/11