bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: code/module request: undo setuid


From: Sam Steingold
Subject: Re: code/module request: undo setuid
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:06:15 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080506)

Bruno Haible wrote:
Sam Steingold wrote:

Please see the discussion here:
https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=5611456

The discussion is here:
  http://news.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.clisp.general/cutoff=12548
  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.clisp.general/12533
Please don't recommend URLs to https://sourceforge.net/forum/ any more -
I refuse to read discussions in an advertisement loaded environment.

if you login to SF (which is required to reply), you do not see any ads.
at least I don't (with FF/ABP/easylist).

In that discussion,
  - Fare says that he has some Lisp-based executables that are setuid root,
  - You insist on having an option that, given a Lisp-based executable,
    allows to get into a REP loop for that executable.

Taken together, it means that every setuid Lisp-based executable allows
every user to take control of the machine.

no, because before dumping the image I remove the suid bit.

All I can do is to revert setuid for a dangerous operation.

Is the REP loop above the "dangerous operation" you are talking about?

yes.

If so, the magic is

/* This is for executables that have the setgid bit set.  */
#if HAVE_SETREGID
  setregid (getgid (), getgid ());
#else
  setegid (getgid ());
#endif
/* This is for executables that have the setuid bit set.  */
#if HAVE_SETREUID
  setreuid (getuid (), getuid ());
#else
  seteuid (getuid ());
#endif

looks simple enough.
nevertheless, could you please add an "unsuid" module?

thanks

Sam.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]