[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: working with "good enough" functions
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: working with "good enough" functions |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:34:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.28; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Thursday 08 January 2009 04:49:16 Paul Eggert wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <address@hidden> writes:
> > i explicitly pulled in the
> > printf-posix module because i want a posix implementation on crappy
> > systems. but i dont care if said systems have broken floating point
> > implementations since i dont use floating point in my code.
>
> If this happens often enough, perhaps gnulib should have a
> printf-posix-no-fp module that does what you want?
i would certainly use it, but if i'm the only one expressing interest thus
far, then maybe it isnt a hot issue.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/04
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/04
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/01/05
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/05
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Paul Eggert, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Eric Blake, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions,
Mike Frysinger <=
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Simon Josefsson, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/08
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/17
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Mike Frysinger, 2009/01/18
- Re: working with "good enough" functions, Simon Josefsson, 2009/01/18