[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more m4 quoting
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: more m4 quoting |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:57:32 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Bruno Haible on 1/13/2009 2:26 PM:
> What's the rationale of quoting purely numeric m4 arguments, like in
> AC_DEFINE([FOO], [1], ...) ?
> It looks a bit like clutter to me, since quoting does not matter here. But
> if you and Eric and Simon are willing to do this purely for consistency,
> I'm going with it as well.
I like the consistency - it's easier to quote everything than it is to
explain why some arguments don't need quoting.
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkltRowACgkQ84KuGfSFAYD7cwCfatdzewYkCcEuORwX+cM8JyIT
sKAAoKhlw7bZ2Rb/km5ZOlMCzsbkDCRu
=ZYT7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----