[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: url's in --help output
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: url's in --help output |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:04:25 -0600 |
so would be happy to throw this patch away -- or to apply it.
What do others think?
Ok, I'm not "others", but of course I vote to apply it, except for this
line:
+ printf (_("\nReport %s bugs to %s\n"), last_component (program_name),
If we're going to leave out the period, I think it should use a colon,
so it's not just a sentence without a period. I mean:
Report bugs to: %s\n
Ralf pointed out to me in separate email that the <...> allow
better recognition in some contexts. I don't necessarily advocate for
never using <...>, but I don't see a specific reason to do so here.
Anyway ... still shrugging ...
- Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] url's in --help output, (continued)
- Re: url's in --help output, Eric Blake, 2009/01/24
- Re: url's in --help output, Karl Berry, 2009/01/24
- Re: url's in --help output, Eric Blake, 2009/01/24
- Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] url's in --help output, Eric Blake, 2009/01/27
- Re: url's in --help output, Eric Blake, 2009/01/28
- Re: url's in --help output, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/28
- Re: url's in --help output, Karl Berry, 2009/01/29
- Re: url's in --help output, Jim Meyering, 2009/01/30
- Re: url's in --help output,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: url's in --help output, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/01/31
- Re: url's in --help output, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/31
- Re: url's in --help output, Karl Berry, 2009/01/31
- Re: url's in --help output, Ben Asselstine, 2009/01/31
- Re: url's in --help output, Bruno Haible, 2009/01/31
- Re: url's in --help output, Karl Berry, 2009/01/31
- Re: url's in --help output, Karl Berry, 2009/01/29