[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Relocatable packages, once again
|
From: |
Ivan Levashew |
|
Subject: |
Relocatable packages, once again |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:09:53 +0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; ru; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 ThunderBrowse/3.2.2.1 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
On Mac OS X, relocatability is a must.
Mac OS X has own means of making relocatable bundles, but they don't
fill well into gnu-lib relocatability model. It is indeed possible to
make relocatable bundle, but it's not always trivial. gnu-lib doesn't
support Mac OS X relocatability model at the moment.
I have noticed that discussions about relocatability occured in the far
2003. Why didn't relocatability maid its way into GTK+ and other
autotools packages? Isn't it essential to make a "normal" program?
--
If you want to get to the top, you have to start at the bottom
- Relocatable packages, once again,
Ivan Levashew <=
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/02/11
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Ivan Levashew, 2009/02/11
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/02/11
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Ivan Levashew, 2009/02/11
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/02/11
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Ivan Levashew, 2009/02/11