Re: shared library symbol exports and versioning

[Simon Josefsson]

Bruno Haible <address@hidden> writes:

> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Given that the parameter is called --version-script, I think
>> "version-script" would be a better name for the module.
>
> Even the suffix "-script" is a bit of a misnomer, IMO. I would call it
> 'symbol-versions'. If you agree with that, I'll rename the 'visbility'
> module to 'symbol-visibility', for consistency.

Sounds good, please do it.

OTOH, "symbol" has many meanings, so maybe "library-symbol-versions" or
"libsymbol-versions" would reduce potential for collisions, but the name
becomes quite long so I don't like it.

>> It seems (a) has already been fixed right?
>
> Nearly. Forgot to commit doc/gnulib.texi yesterday. Now I merged with your
> commit:

Thanks.

/Simon