[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: argp warnings
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: argp warnings |
Date: |
Sat, 9 May 2009 00:28:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> *** argp.11760 Fri May 8 08:56:27 2009
> --- - Fri May 8 08:56:27 2009
> ***************
> *** 1,4 ****
> Usage: test-argp [-tvCSOlp?V] [-f FILE] [-o[ARG]] [--test] [--file=FILE]
> [--input=FILE] [--verbose] [--cantiga] [--sonet] [--option]
> ! [--optional[=ARG]] [--limerick] [--poem] [--help] [--usage]
> ! [--version] ARGS...
> --- 1,4 ----
> Usage: test-argp [-tvCSOlp?V] [-f FILE] [-o[ARG]] [--test] [--file=FILE]
> [--input=FILE] [--verbose] [--cantiga] [--sonet] [--option]
> ! [--optional[=ARG]] [--limerick] [--poem] [--help] [--version]
> ! [--usage] ARGS...
This was already reported in 2007 [1] and 2008 [2]. I believe the cause is
that the qsort() call in lib/argp-help.c is sensitive to the implementation
of qsort. In other words, the comparison criterion passed to qsort may return 0
for different entries.
Bruno
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2007-03/msg00274.html
[2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2008-04/msg00213.html
- argp warnings, Eric Blake, 2009/05/08
- Re: argp warnings,
Bruno Haible <=