Re: [PATCH] warn on missing selinux files

[Paolo Bonzini]

> That all looks fine, except the comment for your new function,
> gl_LIBSELINUX belongs in the .m4 file, and not just in the log.

Ok.

> For the log, this would then be fine:
>
>         (gl_LIBSELINUX): New function.  Extracted from...
>
> > Ok?  Should I test /selinux instead of /selinux/enforce?
>
> That would be better, since a system for which $(getenforce) reports
> "Permissive", that /selinux/enforce won't exist.
> It might be better still simply to see if getenforce can be run.

getenforce is not installed on a Debian non-SELinux-enabled system, 
still such a system has /selinux and can use libselinux.

Paolo