bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [PATCH] open: introduce O_NOSTD
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:04:40 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

According to Florian Weimer on 8/28/2009 6:52 AM:
> * Eric Blake:
> 
>> Your version fails to clear the cloexec bit of the final fd if the
>> original caller didn't request O_CLOEXEC.
> 
> Okay, but you can fix that in a race-free manner (but I thought that
> this was implied by open_safer).

The current semantics of gnulib's open_safer is that the result is
guaranteed to be 3 or larger.  It would require an audit of all gnulib
clients of the open_safer method to see whether it also makes sense to
change the semantics of open_safer to also guarantee that fds start life
with the cloexec bit set.  But maybe that is a change worth making in
gnulib, with applications intending to give an fd to a child process being
required to explicitly clear the cloexec bit.

>> Also, your suggestion has a definite race in that you are calling
>> open() multiple times rather than cloning an existing fd after the
>> first open(), such that another process could alter which file is
>> visited between your first and last open().
> 
> Sure, but this is an unobservable differen.ce

It is absolutely observable - if the user passed O_CREAT|O_EXCL as part of
their flags, then the second open() will inappropriately fail.

- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!

Eric Blake             address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqX1egACgkQ84KuGfSFAYDKWACeMM4spqCsmgVVwME9+C/1tdpU
g7wAnR9FetGPGr7acXLfLIVvzYZ7tpz3
=VjUY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]