[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:04:24 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:
> However, is this really necessary?
> You're not running gitlog-to-changelog manually, are you?
> If it's scripted, you can easily invoke it via "perl gitlog-to-changelog ..."
True, but then among the scripts under ‘build-aux’, some are invoked
directly by ‘maint.mk’, some like ‘announce-gen’ are typically invoked
manually, etc. And they have the executable bit set anyway, so it feels
more natural to run them directly.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
- Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Simon Josefsson, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/30
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Karl Berry, 2009/10/29