[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: output from syntax-check
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: output from syntax-check |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Nov 2009 08:33:13 -0500 |
> Unfortunately, doing that is often at odds with the goals of
> keeping the test code simple and efficient. If you find small
> and clean changes that improve matters without inducing
> inordinate inefficiency even in projects with thousands of source
> files, please send a patch.
Proposed sed extension to help this:
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-utils/2009-11/msg00030.html>
This is a good aproach, but for compilation-mode to work you need the
line number as well. Would it be acceptable for syntax-check to use
this option if it is included in GNU sed? It wouldn't be compatible
with POSIX sed, but one could do a check for the option and only use
it if one is using GNU sed.