[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: untabify?
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: untabify? |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:57:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Hi Jim,
> I would be happy to do that to all of gnulib.
> It is long overdue.
Great!
When? It's a disruptive change: Everyone who has patches on top of gnulib
will have to update these. But since we are in continuous development mode
constantly, any time is as good as any other time. (Actually, *before* the
Christmas vacations is better for those of us with little spare time.)
Which set of files? I would say,
- m4/*.m4 yes
- lib/**/*.[hcy] yes except the regex module
because the regex module is the only major source code for
which we still have bidirectional propagation between gnulib and glibc,
- lib/*.charset no, as it needs a different treatment
- lib/*.class no, as it's a binary file
- modules/* no, as it contains Makefile snippets
> perl -MText::Tabs -ni -le \
> '$m=/^( *\t[ \t]*)(.*)/; print $m ? expand($1) . $2 : $_'
How is this different from "expand -i"? Also, I would try both "expand"
and "expand -i" and look at the differences one by one.
Bruno
- untabify?, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/06
- Re: untabify?, Pádraig Brady, 2009/12/06
- Re: untabify?, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/07
- Re: untabify?,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: untabify?, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/07
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/09
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/09
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/09
- expanding TABs in indentation: the aftermath can be easy, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/11
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Karl Berry, 2009/12/09
- Re: doc vs. README, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/10
- Message not available
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Simon Josefsson, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/10