[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: untabify - last call for objections
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: untabify - last call for objections |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:42:52 +0100 |
Bruno Haible wrote:
> What should I write in the NEWS file, about recommendations for people who
> have
> patches on top of gnulib?
We also need a way to keep things in order going forward.
I.e., a syntax-check style rule that enforces this style.
To that end, please prepare a file like the one below,
to be committed along with your other changes,
or as part of a subsequent change that enforces policy.
I started based on your earlier outline.
These are extended regular expressions that match
any file that must retain TAB-based indentation.
For now, let's not worry about TABs elsewhere.
--------------------------
# These contain Makefile snippets.
^modules/
# The regex module is the only major source code for which we still
# have bidirectional propagation between gnulib and glibc.
^lib/regcomp\.c$
^lib/regex\.[ch]$
^lib/regex_internal\.[ch]$
^lib/regexec\.c$
# This is special.
^lib/.*\.charset$
# This is a binary file.
^lib/.*\.class$
--------------------------
> What are the tricks?
I'll try to post details tomorrow.
- untabify?, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/06
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Simon Josefsson, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Simon Josefsson, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify, coding standards, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/10