[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: untabify - last call for objections
|
From: |
Karl Berry |
|
Subject: |
Re: untabify - last call for objections |
|
Date: |
Wed, 9 Dec 2009 22:39:09 GMT |
*** README.orig 2009-12-09 20:16:50.000000000 +0100
--- README 2009-12-09 19:36:18.000000000 +0100
How about adding everything in README to gnulib.texi, and generating it?
The README grows and grows, in both length and importance ...
- untabify?, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/06
- Re: untabify?, Pádraig Brady, 2009/12/06
- Re: untabify?, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/07
- Re: untabify?, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/07
- Re: untabify?, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/07
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/09
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/09
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/09
- expanding TABs in indentation: the aftermath can be easy, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/11
- Re: untabify - last call for objections,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: doc vs. README, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/10
- Message not available
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Simon Josefsson, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Simon Josefsson, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify, coding standards, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify, coding standards, Simon Josefsson, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Pádraig Brady, 2009/12/10
- Re: untabify - last call for objections, Simon Josefsson, 2009/12/10