[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: link-warning usage improvements
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: link-warning usage improvements |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:19:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> + * tests/test-signal.c (main): Enhance test.
One part of this does not look right. OK to remove this?
*** tests/test-signal.c.orig Thu Dec 31 22:18:46 2009
--- tests/test-signal.c Thu Dec 31 22:18:31 2009
***************
*** 110,118 ****
#ifdef SIGXFSZ
case SIGXFSZ:
#endif
- #ifdef SIG
- case SIG:
- #endif
/* SIGRTMIN and SIGRTMAX need not be compile-time constants. */
#if 0
# ifdef SIGRTMIN
--- 110,115 ----
- link-warning usage improvements, Eric Blake, 2009/12/24
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Jim Meyering, 2009/12/24
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/24
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Eric Blake, 2009/12/30
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Eric Blake, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Eric Blake, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Eric Blake, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Eric Blake, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Eric Blake, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Eric Blake, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Eric Blake, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Bruno Haible, 2009/12/31
- Re: link-warning usage improvements, Eric Blake, 2009/12/31