[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] bootstrap: a new option --no-git, prohibiting the use git in
From: |
Aleksey Avdeev |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] bootstrap: a new option --no-git, prohibiting the use git in the bootstrap process. |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:04:18 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; ru; rv:1.9.1.5pre) Gecko/20091019 Thunderbird/3.0pre |
20.03.2010 15:00, Eric Blake пишет:
> [writing to undisclosed-recipients makes it hard to guess where you
> wanted the reply to go to]
>
> On 03/19/2010 09:52 AM, Aleksey Avdeev wrote:
>> Ability to explicitly disable the use git when calling bootstrap will
>> exclude recourse to third-party resources for assembly rpm package. What,
>> in particular, significantly simplify the preparation of packages to build
>> on git.alt
>> (see <http://en.altlinux.org/Git.alt_reference#Building_packages_with_gear>).
>>
>> The patch in my repository:
>> <http://git.altlinux.org/people/solo/public/?p=gnulib.git;a=commit;h=8741ad8a412b2aa9f7a4e3fc69902c12a6ed9d69>.
>>
>> Background: see <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562743>.
>
> So if I understand correctly, you are trying to re-bootstrap libvirt
> rather than using a tarball which has already been bootstrapped, but in
> the process, you don't want to use git. Why? From an rpm perspective,
> it seems like you should have no need to rerun bootstrap - use the
> existing tarball which has already been bootstrapped. Without a solid
> reasoning why it is desirable to rerun bootstrap without having the full
> compliment of developer tools available, I don't see what this patch
> buys you.
Instead, this patch be satisfactory to me, if it is taken into account
the remark Dmitry V. Levin: see
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-03/msg00244.html>.
--
С уважением. Алексей.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature