Re: new syntax-check rule for @acronym?

[jemarch]

   > This hangs for non-GNU projects, like libvirt, that have no .texi
   > documentation.  We really need to make progress on the patch to refactor
   > maint.mk rules per Jose's ideas:
   > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-02/msg00242.html
   > which would conveniently fix this rule in the process.

   IMHO, the address@hidden rule belongs in an optionally-enabled class
   of tests.

Are you thinking about something like

   make syntax-check RULESET=gnu-strict

Would be nice to get maint.mk to include a local syntax.mk (if it
exists) provided by the maintainers where customized rules could be
defined making use of _sc_search_regexp.

But then, how to define the sets of rules?

-- 
Jose E. Marchesi  <address@hidden>
                  http://www.jemarch.net
GNU Project       http://www.gnu.org