Re: in-memory representation of NULL pointers?

[Bruno Haible]

Pádraig Brady wrote:
> The awkward macro is required to suppress warnings.
> I've asked gcc to relax that particular warning as referenced here:
> http://www.pixelbeat.org/programming/gcc/auto_init.html

In July 2008, the only reply to your request said "Please fill a bugzilla
PR so that it is not lost." [1] You did that in December 2008 [2]. But nothing
happened since then. 

Maybe you can speed up the process by proposing a patch. (Look for
warn_missing_field_initializers in gcc/c-typeck.c.)

Bruno

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-07/msg00124.html
[2] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36750