[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setproctitle()
|
From: |
Peter Seebach |
|
Subject: |
Re: setproctitle() |
|
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 10:21:58 -0500 |
In message <address@hidden>, Jim Meyering writes:
>Can you simply declare the copyright to be LGPLv2+?
>Many modules are already LGPLv2+ (see modules/*).
I could if I were just releasing the code myself, but if the FSF needs
a copyright assignment, does that not imply that I no longer get to
choose the copyright?
-s
- setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/03
- Re: setproctitle(), Jim Meyering, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Jim Meyering, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(),
Peter Seebach <=
- Re: setproctitle(), Eric Blake, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Jim Meyering, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Paolo Bonzini, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Eric Blake, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Karl Berry, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Karl Berry, 2010/05/04