[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: setproctitle()
From: |
Peter Seebach |
Subject: |
Re: setproctitle() |
Date: |
Tue, 04 May 2010 10:53:56 -0500 |
In message <address@hidden>, "Alfred M. Szmidt" writes:
>If the FSF is the copyright holder, then there is no (legal) need to
>ask the original author about permission to relicense the work. It
>might be a nice thing to do, but if the original author says no for
>some reason, the FSF can still relicense the work; they are the
>copyright holders.
And for that matter, it seems that at that point, the original author
doesn't have the right to just keep a copy under the terms under which
they intended to release it... Thus the issue. (It turns out that
GPLv3 is pretty deeply problematic for me; it turns out that I'd rather
just let people like TiVO play stupid games than have to deal with v3.)
-s
- setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/03
- Re: setproctitle(), Jim Meyering, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Jim Meyering, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Eric Blake, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(),
Peter Seebach <=
- Re: setproctitle(), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Jim Meyering, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Paolo Bonzini, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Eric Blake, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Karl Berry, 2010/05/05
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Karl Berry, 2010/05/04
- Re: setproctitle(), Peter Seebach, 2010/05/04
Re: setproctitle(), Bruno Haible, 2010/05/04