[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about critical_factorization() in the Two-Way algorithm
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: Question about critical_factorization() in the Two-Way algorithm |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jun 2010 08:41:34 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100430 Fedora/3.0.4-3.fc13 Lightning/1.0b2pre Mnenhy/0.8.2 Thunderbird/3.0.4 |
On 06/22/2010 08:34 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Cool, that's what I expected from the names.
> So do we just need to move a docs around a little like:
>
> diff --git a/doc/glibc-functions/memmem.texi b/doc/glibc-functions/memmem.texi
> index c7e3d73..7d34817 100644
> --- a/doc/glibc-functions/memmem.texi
> +++ b/doc/glibc-functions/memmem.texi
> @@ -13,14 +13,14 @@ MacOS X 10.3, FreeBSD 5.2.1, OpenBSD 4.0, AIX 4.3.2,
> HP-UX 11, IRIX 6.5, OSF/1 5
> @item
> This function has reversed arguments on some older platforms:
> Linux libc 5.0.9
> address@hidden itemize
> -
> -Portability problems fixed by Gnulib module @code{memmem}:
> address@hidden
> @item
> This function returns incorrect values in some cases, such as when
> given an empty needle:
> glibc <= 2.0, Cygwin 1.5.x.
> address@hidden itemize
> +
> +Portability problems fixed by Gnulib module @code{memmem}:
> address@hidden
> @item
> This function has quadratic instead of linear worst-case complexity on some
> platforms:
Yes, that looks like an appropriate patch. Please apply.
--
Eric Blake address@hidden +1-801-349-2682
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature