[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer
From: |
Reuben Thomas |
Subject: |
Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:56:09 +0100 |
On 30 July 2010 19:37, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 07/30/2010 08:35 PM, Reuben Thomas wrote:
>>
>> So am I right in concluding that the comment for REG_NEWLINE in
>> regex.h is the wrong way around?
>
> Yes.
Thanks, I will update the patch for the bug I submitted to glibc earlier.
--
http://rrt.sc3d.org
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, (continued)
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Bruno Haible, 2010/07/29
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/29
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer,
Reuben Thomas <=
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/30