[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: module libposix
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: module libposix |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:59:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Bruce,
> Notice from module atexit:
> This module is obsolete.
> ...
> Notice from module error:
> If you are using GNU gettext version 0.16.1 or older, add the
>
> This sounds like something I've said before: Should recommended procedures
> *not* trigger "this is obsolete" type messages?
So, what do you suggest? Should the recommended procedure in the documentation
be different? Or should the 'posix-modules' command accept --with-obsolete/
--without-obsolete options?
Patches and suggestions welcome.
> (sharutils also runs into these
> messages because of cascaded dependencies requiring obsolete stuff.)
This should be fixed since 2008-11-02. Nowadays, the handling of obsolete
modules
is as documented here:
<http://www.gnu.org/software/gnulib/manual/html_node/Obsolete-modules.html>
> This is all I noticed out of the three thousand four hundred odd lines
> of output.
> That is very impressive and impossible to eyeball parse.
I would use 'grep' to filter out the uninteresting parts of the log.
Bruno
- Re: module libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/09/18
- Re: module libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/09/18
- Re: module libposix,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: module libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/09/18
- Re: module libposix, Bruno Haible, 2010/09/18
- Re: module libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/09/18
- Re: module libposix, Bruno Haible, 2010/09/18
- Re: module libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/09/19
- Re: module libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/09/20
- Re: module libposix, Eric Blake, 2010/09/20
- Re: module libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/09/20
- Re: module libposix, Matt Rice, 2010/09/21
- Re: module libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/09/21