[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libposix
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: libposix |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 14:02:21 -0700 |
Hi Bruno,
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> $ for m in `./posix-modules` ; do ./gnulib-tool --extract-link-directive $m ;
> done
[...]
> $(LTLIBICONV) when linking with libtool, $(LIBICONV) otherwise
It seems that ``--extract-link-directive'' thinks it is sending output
to a human.
Obviously, I can parse this output, but if it presumes a human reader,
someone could change the output in unpredictable ways.
Perhaps pay attention to "--libtool" and "--no-libtool" for it?
Such that this works for my purpose:
for m in $(posix-modules)
do gnulib-tool --libtool --extract-link-directive $m
done > libadd-list
It should also not be necessary to remove empty lines.
- libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/03
- Re: libposix, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/03
- Re: libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/04
- Re: libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/04
- Re: libposix, Bruno Haible, 2010/10/04
- Re: libposix, Eric Blake, 2010/10/04
- Re: libposix,
Bruce Korb <=
- Re: libposix, Bruce Korb, 2010/10/04
- gnulib-tool and shared libraries (was: Re: libposix), Bruno Haible, 2010/10/04
- -no-undefined (was: libposix), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Bruno Haible, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Bruno Haible, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Bruce Korb, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Bruno Haible, 2010/10/05
- Re: -no-undefined (was: libposix), Bruce Korb, 2010/10/06