Re: glibc's snprintf is a pig; fix or replace ?

[Bruce Korb]

On 11/03/10 02:41, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> I (and I believe others) would still like to see this happen, but as is
> usual for such things I believe the main thing holding it back is a lack
> of time from concerned parties, and overcoming the inertia to get it
> started.  Your message adds another good reason to the list of why doing
> this would be useful...


Well, I may have a little time for it.  Maybe I can polish it over
the next week or two.  My ex-employer decided to rethink how to do
the software and just dumped half their staff, including me.
Pending next employment, I do have a little time.....but I'll likely look
at the libposix stuff first.

Cheers - Bruce